Learn all about the prop firm industry, proprietary trading, and what it takes to become a successful prop trader by reading our free guides.
Look, if you’re shopping for a prop trading course right now, the market is a mess. There are hundreds of courses promising to get you funded in 30 days, coaches flexing Lamborghinis from trading profits that may or may not exist, and a handful of genuinely useful programs buried underneath a mountain of garbage.
Having followed this space for years and spent a lot of time in r/propfirms, r/Daytrading, and Trustpilot comment sections reading what actual traders think, here’s what I’ve found: most prop trading courses fail their students not because the content is wrong, but because they’re teaching the wrong thing entirely.
Spoiler: passing a funded challenge isn’t about having a fancy strategy. It’s mostly about risk management and psychological discipline. The best courses understand this. Most don’t.
Quick Comparison: Course Types at a Glance
| Course Type | Best For | Price Range | Red Flag? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Udemy-style video courses | Beginners learning basics | $15–$100 | Only if no community/updates |
| Dedicated prop firm schools | Serious futures learners | $500–$5,000+ | Yes, if no verifiable instructors |
| Challenge prep programs | Traders already have a strategy | $100–$500 | If they guarantee funded status |
| Free YouTube/ICT | Self-directed learners | Free | No, genuinely solid free content exists |
| 1-on-1 mentorship | Advanced traders with specific gaps | $500–$3,000/mo | If mentor won’t show verified results |
| Firm-included education | Beginners (Topstep, some others) | Included | Rarely, usually fine |
What a Good Prop Trading Course Actually Teaches
Before you spend a dime on anything, you need to understand what skills actually matter for getting funded and staying funded. Because there’s a gap between “strategy that works in general” and “strategy that works within prop firm rules.”
The firms don’t care that you have a brilliant scalping system on ES. They care whether you can trade it without blowing past a max daily loss (typically 4–5% of account size) and without having 1 monster day that trips a consistency rule. These are completely different skills than trading profitably.
A genuinely good course will cover all of this:
Technical analysis and strategy fundamentals. You need a repeatable, backtested edge. Doesn’t have to be complicated. Traders report that simple support/resistance and price action setups often outperform indicator-heavy systems in challenge environments because they’re easier to follow mechanically under pressure. But you do need something.
Risk management specifically tuned for prop rules. This is where most traders fail. Community reports on Reddit are full of people who had profitable demo accounts but kept blowing challenges because they sized positions the same way they would with personal capital. A $100k prop account challenge is not the same as trading your own $100k. The rules are different. Your psychology is different because you know you’ll lose the fee if you blow up. Good courses address this directly.
Trading psychology. I know this sounds like fluffy stuff, but it’s not. The prop firm challenge environment produces a specific kind of pressure that retail trading doesn’t. You’re racing (sometimes against a time limit), you’re aware of every drawdown tick, and revenge trading after a losing day is probably the #1 account killer. Traders consistently mention this in their post-mortems. The 43-days-to-pass accounts you read on Medium all have the same arc: guy starts well, gets greedy or careless around day 7-10, nearly blows up, slows down, and then grinds out the rest with tiny positions.
Challenge-specific mechanics. Trailing drawdowns, end-of-day (EOD) drawdown rules vs. real-time trailing, consistency rules, minimum trading days, news event restrictions. Any course that doesn’t spend serious time on these is leaving you unprepared for the thing you’re actually being tested on.
The Courses and Programs Worth Knowing About
ICT / Inner Circle Trading (Free)
This is going to sound insane, but one of the genuinely most useful starting points is completely free. Michael Huddleston’s ICT (Inner Circle Trading) methodology is available on YouTube and has been for years. Order blocks, fair value gaps, liquidity grabs, kill zones, Silver Bullet setups during the 10 AM to 11 AM EST New York session.
The ICT framework is now dominant in funded trading communities. Traders on r/propfirms constantly reference it. Based on community reports and Trustpilot reviews from firms like Phidias and FundedNext, traders using ICT-based approaches tend to have higher success rates in challenges specifically because the methodology focuses on high-probability setups rather than high-frequency scalping. You’re waiting for specific conditions. That plays well within prop rules.
What works: The conceptual framework is genuinely sound. Order blocks and fair value gaps help explain why price does things that confuse indicator-based traders. The kill zone concept helps traders avoid low-probability market periods.
What doesn’t: ICT content is overwhelming and inconsistently organized. There’s a legitimate learning curve just finding the right videos in the right order. And there’s a vocal community of skeptics who point out that backtesting ICT concepts is harder than backtesting something more mechanical. You’ll spend 3 to 6 months just getting comfortable with the basics.
Oh, and about the consistency thing: prop firms want you profitable across multiple days, not spiking huge on one session. ICT’s patient, setup-specific approach actually fits that requirement well.
Cost: Free. No reason not to start here if you’re newer to trading.
Udemy Courses (Budget Entry Point)
There are several Udemy courses specifically targeting prop firm challenges, and a few are actually decent. The SMC/ICT-focused ones by instructors like “The Unflagged Trader” and others specifically targeting futures prop firms (ES, NQ setups) run $15 to $30 on sale, which is basically always.
The standout here is the “Get Funded with Prop Firms: Master Futures Trading Using SMC” course, which directly addresses the connection between SMC methodology and challenge mechanics. Based on student reviews, it covers liquidity grabs, order blocks, and market imbalances in the context of passing funded evaluations, not just trading abstractly.
Is it perfect? No. Udemy courses are static, meaning they don’t update with rule changes at specific firms, and some instructors are better teachers than traders. But for $20, you’re getting a structured intro that’s miles better than random YouTube hopping.
Bottom line: Start here if you need structure and can’t afford premium programs. Spend $20, not $2,000, until you know what you don’t know.
Free Resources Seriously Worth Using (No Course Needed)
This is unpopular to say on a site that reviews paid programs, but: for a lot of traders, a structured free approach is better than a mediocre paid course.
Topstep’s educational content. Topstep has built an education section and performance coaching resources specifically around their Trading Combine and funded account requirements. The content is tailored to their exact rules, which means you’re not learning generic trading theory. You’re learning how to trade within the specific constraints of their challenge structure. If you’re going to trade with Topstep anyway, use their materials.
r/propfirms and r/Daytrading. Reading through post histories of people who passed and failed specific challenges is legitimately educational. You’ll learn more about trailing drawdowns, consistency rules, and common mistakes from 6 months of lurking than from some courses that charge $500.
Apex Trader Funding’s community resources. Traders report Apex having a decent community of funded traders who share what works within their specific rules. The rules at Apex are more permissive than most firms (no daily drawdown in the challenge, relatively forgiving trailing drawdown), so strategy that works elsewhere might still fail at Apex if you’re not calibrated to their specific parameters.
Red Flags: Courses That Are Wasting Your Money
Okay, here’s where I get blunt.
The “challenge guarantee” programs. Any program that promises or strongly implies you’ll pass a prop firm challenge if you complete their course is lying to you. Challenge pass rates are estimated at 5 to 10% industry-wide based on trader reports. Nobody’s course changes that fundamentally. These programs are selling false confidence.
The Lamborghini-and-lifestyle marketers. You know the ones. They show screenshots of funded payouts, promise $10k months within 90 days, and sell a $997 course that’s really just a repackaged collection of YouTube content. The warning sign is always when the marketing focuses on income rather than skill development. Legitimate courses lead with what you’ll learn and how you’ll develop as a trader. Scam-adjacent courses lead with how much money you’ll make.
Courses with no verifiable instructor track records. This is tricky because verified trading records are genuinely hard to obtain (many traders have NDAs), but there’s a spectrum. Some paid vendors have the FCA regulated trading arm and verifiable professional traders. A random Udemy course instructor who can’t show you anything? That’s a different situation. Look for instructors who at minimum discuss their methodology transparently and have third-party reviews that address substance, not just style.
Static content with no community. Markets change. Prop firm rules change. A course that was accurate in 2022 may teach you incorrect drawdown rules for 2025. Good educational programs either update content or have community spaces where current information gets shared. If it’s a one-time video purchase with no update mechanism, be cautious.
What You Actually Need Before Any Course
This is the part most courses won’t tell you because it’s bad for sales.
If you don’t have a consistently profitable strategy, backtested over at minimum 6 months (preferably 12+), no course will help you pass a prop firm challenge. What you’ll be doing is paying challenge fees repeatedly while also paying course fees. That’s expensive and demoralizing.
Traders on Reddit report this loop constantly: buy course, attempt challenge, blow up around day 7-10, buy another challenge, blow up again. The missing piece isn’t usually more course content. It’s a proven edge and the emotional framework to execute it consistently under pressure.
Before spending on a paid course, ask yourself honestly:
Have you backtested your strategy on historical data? On ES or NQ (if trading futures), can you simulate running your approach through a 6-month period without violating challenge rules? If you can’t answer this with something concrete, start with backtesting tools like Forex Tester or the TradingView replay feature. That work is more valuable than any course content.
Are you profitable on a small live account? Not demo. Live. Demo trading doesn’t produce the psychology required to survive a funded challenge. Even a $500 live futures account trading MES or MNQ gives you better preparation than 100 hours of demo trading.
How to Actually Pick a Prop Trading Course
The honest answer is that the “best” course depends heavily on where you are in your trading development.
Total beginners who have never traded futures before need fundamentals: what is an ES contract, how do margins work in a prop challenge context, what are order blocks, what does a trailing drawdown actually mean in practice. Udemy courses and free ICT content handle this fine.
Traders with some experience who keep failing challenges usually have one of three problems: they’re overtrading, they’re not understanding the specific rules of the challenge they’re attempting, or they have a strategy that works in trending markets but falls apart in chop. A course that addresses trading psychology (like CTI’s Psychology Blueprint) and challenge mechanics specifically is more useful than more strategy content.
Advanced traders who already have a repeatable edge but want to level up should skip courses and look at specific mentorship or programs like Axia’s Footprint Edge that go deep into order flow tools. Depth on one skill is more valuable than breadth on things you already know.
And honestly? If you’re spending $500+ on a course but don’t have that same money set aside for challenge fees, you’ve got your priorities backwards. The challenge is the real teacher.
The Bottom Line
Most people who fail prop firm challenges don’t fail because they didn’t take a course. They fail because they took on funded capital before their trading process was actually ready for the rules-based environment, or because their psychology under pressure wasn’t where it needed to be.
A good course helps. A great course might shave months off your learning curve. But the progression that actually works, based on years of following this space and reading thousands of trader reports, looks like this: learn the basics (free ICT, Udemy, whatever), build a strategy you’ve actually tested, practice on small live capital, understand the specific rules of the firm you want to target, then attempt a challenge.
If you want a paid recommendation that won’t break the bank: start with a Udemy course on SMC/ICT fundamentals ($20 on sale), supplement with free Topstep or firm-specific educational resources, and direct the rest of your budget toward small live trading experience and challenge fees.
If you’re serious and have the capital: Axia’s Footprint Edge or Career Programme is the most legitimate premium program in the space, particularly if you want to trade ES and NQ with order flow tools. Expect to spend real money and real time.
Whatever you choose, don’t confuse buying a course with doing the work. The market doesn’t grade on effort.
FAQ
Can a prop trading course guarantee I’ll pass a challenge?
No. And any course making this claim is a red flag. Industry estimates put challenge pass rates at 5 to 10%, and traders report that most failures are psychological (revenge trading, overtrading, not respecting drawdown rules) rather than strategic. A course can teach you the concepts. It can’t execute discipline for you.
Is ICT / Smart Money Concepts actually useful for prop firm trading?
Yes, genuinely. The ICT framework (order blocks, fair value gaps, liquidity concepts, kill zones) is now widely used by funded traders. Community reports from Phidias, FundedNext, and various trader forums consistently mention ICT-based strategies performing well in challenge environments because they emphasize high-probability, patient setups over high-frequency trading. That meshes well with consistency rules. The best part is that solid ICT foundations are available free from Michael Huddleston’s YouTube channel.
What platforms do I need to know for prop trading?
Depends on the firm. Most futures-focused firms use NinjaTrader, Tradovate, or TradingView as their primary platforms. Some use Rithmic data feeds with various front-end platforms including R|Trader and Quantower. Whatever course you take, make sure it includes at least passing coverage of the platforms used by the specific firm you’re targeting.
How long does it realistically take to prepare for a prop firm challenge?
Most traders on Reddit and Medium report needing 6 to 12 months of consistent preparation before attempting a challenge seriously (as opposed to burning money on challenges before they’re ready). That includes backtesting, small live account experience, and working through the emotional aspects of trading under rules-based constraints. People who rush it typically spend more money in failed challenge fees than they would have spent just practicing longer.
Should I take a course before or after attempting a challenge?
Honestly, probably after your first failure. Your first challenge attempt will teach you more about your actual weaknesses than any course. You’ll discover whether you’re an overtrader, whether you violate max daily loss rules under pressure, whether you have a consistency problem. Then take a course or mentorship specifically targeting those gaps. Going in blind the first time (with a small/cheap challenge account) is a legitimate strategy.
Are there free prop trading courses worth taking?
Yes. ICT’s YouTube content is genuinely comprehensive. Topstep’s own educational materials are solid if you’re specifically targeting their challenge. r/propfirms has wiki content and post histories that are more useful than most paid courses for understanding specific firm rules and common failure patterns.